പേജുകള്‍‌

Rajput


Rajput (from Sanskrit raja-putra, "son of a king" ) is a member of one of the patrilineal clans of western, central, northern India and some parts of Pakistan. They claim to be descendants of ruling Hindu warrior classes of North India.  Rajputs rose to prominence during the 6th to 12th centuries. Until the 20th century, Rajputs ruled in the "overwhelming majority" of the princely states of Rajasthan and Surashtra, where the largest number of princely states were found. 
The Rajput population and the former Rajput states are found spread through much of the subcontinent, particularly in north, west and central India. Populations are found in RajasthanSaurashtraUttar PradeshHimachal PradeshHaryanaJammuPunjabUttarakhandMadhya Pradesh and Bihar.

Origins



The origin of Rajputs is the subject of debate. Writers, such as M. S. Naravane and V. P. Malik, believe that the term was not used to designate a particular tribe or social group until the 6th century AD, as there is no mention of the term in the historical record as pertaining to a social group prior to that time.
  One theory espouses that with the collapse of the Gupta empire from the late 6th century, the invading Hephthalites (White Huns) were probably integrated within the Indian society. Leaders and nobles from among the invaders were assimilated into the Kshatriya ritual rank in the Hinduvarna system, while others who followed and supported them — such as the AhirsGurjars and Jats - were ranked as Shudra. At the same time, some indigenous tribes were ranked as being of the "rajput" Kshatriya status, examples of which are the Bundela, Chandelas
  and Rathors. TheEncyclopaedia Britannica notes that Rajputs "... actually vary greatly in status, from princely lineages, such as the Guhilot and Kachwaha, to simple cultivators."
  However, some scholars, such as C. V. Vaidya and Gauri Shankar Ojha do not accept this.


Rajput kingdoms (8th to 11th centuries)

From the beginning of the 9th century, Rajput dynasties dominated northern parts of India, and the many petty Rajput kingdoms became the primary obstacle to the complete Muslim conquest of Hindu India. Even after the Muslim conquest of the Punjab and the Ganga River valley, the Rajputs maintained their independence in Rajasthan and the forests of central India. Later, Sultan Alauddin Khilji of Khilji dynasty took the two Rajput forts of Chitor and Ranthambhor in eastern Rajasthan but could not hold them for long. 

Maratha domination and British rule

The internal conflicts which existed among the Rajput communities were significant in enabling the Mughal invaders to achieve control over them, while nonetheless recognising the role of the Rajputs as a ruling class. 

British colonial period


The Maratha Confederacy came into conflict with the British Raj, beginning in 1772. After the Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817–1818), all the states in the Rajputana region entered into subsidiary alliance with the East India Company and became princely states under the British Raj. The British took direct control of Ajmer which became the province of Ajmer-Merwara There were about 13 main Rajput states and 2 Jat states namely Bharatpur &Dholpur in the Rajasthan region. During the British regime three more states were created in Rajputana. They were TonkJhalawar and Dholpur. A large number of other Rajput states in central and western India made a similar transition. Most of them were placed under the authority of the Central India Agency and the various states' agencies of Kathiawar.
 

Some British colonial officials were impressed by the military qualities of the Rajputs. In his Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan James Tod writes:
What nation on earth could have maintained the semblance of civilization, the spirit or the customs of their forefathers, during so many centuries of overwhelming depression, but one of such singular character as the Rajpoot? ... Rajast'han exhibits the sole example in the history of mankind, of a people withstanding every outrage barbarity could inflict, or human nature sustain, from a foe whose religion commands annihilation; and bent to the earth, yet rising buoyant from the pressure, and making calamity a whetstone to courage .... Not an iota of their religion or customs have they lost ...
Tod was unusually enamoured of the Rajputs, is venerated by them to this day, and is viewed by many historians since the late nineteenth-century as being a not particularly reliable commentator. Jason Freitag, his only significant biographer, has said that Tod is "manifestly biased". 
The Rajput practice of female infanticide and sati (widow immolation) was another matter of concern to the British colonialists. It was believed that the Rajputs were the primary adherents to these practices, which the Raj considered to be savage and which was the initial impetus for Britishethnographic studies of the subcontinent that eventually manifested itself as a much wider exercise in social engineering. 
In reference to the role of the Rajput soldiers serving under the British banner, Captain A. H. Bingley states:
Rajputs have served in our ranks from Plassey to the present day (1899). They have taken part in almost every campaign undertaken by theIndian armies. Under Forde they defeated the French at Condore. Under Monro at Buxar they routed the forces of the Nawab of Oudh. Under Lake they took part in the brilliant series of victories which destroyed the power of the Marathas
Independent India
On India's independence in 1947, the princely states, including those of the Rajput, were given three choices: join either India or Pakistan, or remain independent. Rajput rulers of the 22 princely states of Rajputana acceded to newly-independent India, amalgamated into the new state of Rajasthan in 1949-1950. Initially the maharajas were granted privy purse in exchange for their acquiescence, but a series of land reforms over the following decades weakened their power, and their privy purse was cut off during Indira Gandhi's administration under the 1971 Constitution 26th Amendment Act. The estates, treasures, and practices of the old Rajput rulers now form a key part of Rajasthan's tourist trade and cultural memory. Today, the Maharajas still fulfill the ceremonial duties of the monarchs of former princely states. 
In 1951, the Rajput Rana dynasty of Nepal came to an end, having been the power behind the throne of the Shah monarchs figureheads since 1846. 

Subdivisions

There are several major subdivisions of Rajputs, known as vansh or vamsha, the step below the super-division jāti.  These vansh delineate claimed descent from various sources, and the Rajput are generally considered to be divided into three primary vansh:  Suryavanshi denotes descent from the solar deity SuryaChandravanshi from the lunar deity Chandra, and Agnivanshifrom the fire deity Agni.  Lesser-noted vansh include UdayvanshiRajvanshi,  and Rishivanshi.  The histories of the various vanshs were later recorded in documents known asvamshāavalīis; André Wink counts these among the "status-legitimizing texts". 
Beneath the vansh division are smaller and smaller subdivisions: kul, shakh ("branch"), khamp or khanp ("twig"), and nak ("twig tip").  Marriages within a kul are generally disallowed (with some flexibility for kul-mates of different gotra lineages). The kul serves as primary identity for many of the Rajput clans, and each kul is protected by a family goddess, the kuldevi. Lindsey Harlan notes that in some cases, skakhs have become powerful enough to be functionally kuls in their own right. 

Culture and ethos


Rajput lifestyle
The Rajputs were a Martial Race in the period of the British Raj.  This was a designation created by administrators that classified each ethnic group as either "martial" or "non-martial": a "martial race" was typically considered brave and well built for fighting,  whilst the remainder were those whom the British believed to be unfit for battle because of their sedentary lifestyles.  "Race" in 19th-century terminology corresponds to the contemporary term "ethnic group", and not in the modern sense of race.
The double-edged scimitar known as the khanda was a popular weapon among the Rajputs of that era. On special occasions, a primary chief would break up a meeting of his vassal chiefs with khanda nariyal, the distribution of daggers and coconuts. Another affirmation of the Rajput's reverence for his sword was the Karga Shapna ("adoration of the sword") ritual, performed during the annual Navaratri festival, after which a Rajput is considered "free to indulge his passion for rapine and revenge". 
By the late 19th century, there was a shift of focus among Rajputs from politics to a concern with kinship. Many Rajputs of Rajasthan are nostalgic about their past and keenly conscious of their genealogy, emphasizing a Rajput ethos that is martial in spirit, with a fierce pride in lineage and tradition.

Bunt (community)

Bunt (   previously spelled Bant) are a community of erstwhile nobilityfeudatory and gentry from the region of Tulu Nadu in the south west of India which comprises the districts of Udupi and Dakshina Kannada in the Indian state of Karnataka and Kasaragod taluk of Kerala. The Bunts claim Kshatriya descent from the Nagavanshi lineage  and are classified as Forward caste  by both the national andstate governments of India. They traditionally follow a matrilineal system of descent and kinship and were endogamous
Etymology

The word Bunt means powerful man or warrior in the Tulu language. 
History

According to S. D. L. Alagodi, the Bunts "... originally belonged to the warrior class. Being the martial race of Tulu Nadu, they served the ruling chiefs which brought them considerable benefits and allowed them to become the landed gentry of the region," 
Some notable Bunt clans who were sovereign of these states are the Honneyakambalis of Hosangadi, Samantha Rajas of Mulki,  Bhair Arasas of Karkala,  Arasas of Kumbla,  Ajilas ofVenur,  Tolaharas of Suralu near Udupi, Heggades of Vitla,  Chowtas of Ullal/Moodabidri,  and the Bangas of Bangadi.  The feudal life and society of Bunts began to disintegrate in the succeeding colonial British Raj period and the Bunts today are a largely urbanized community. 
Subdivision
Traditionally the Bunt community was divided into various sub divisions. The principal among these are: 
  • Masadika Bunt:The single largest subdivision of the community.an overwhelming majority of Bunts belong to this subdivision.the Masadika Bunts natively speak the Tulu language and follow the aliya santana system of matrilineal inheritance. They inhabit or originally hail from the region between Kasaragod town in Kerala and Brahmavar in Udupi district, Karnataka
  • Nad Bunt : The Nad Bunt also known as the Nādava are the second largest subdivision among the Bunts and form a sizeable minority within the Bunt community.The Nad Bunt natively speak Kundagannada, a dialect of the Kannada language, and follow the aliya santana system of matrilineal inheritance. They inhabit or originally hail from Kundapura taluka in Udupi district, Karnataka (north of Brahmavar)
  • Parivara Bunt : The Parivara Bunt are a minuscule minority within the Bunt community and number around few thousands.The Parivara Bunt natively speak the Tulu language but unlike other subdivisions they follow the makkala santana system of patrilineal inheritance. Scattered populations of the Parivara Bunt are mostly found in the taluka of Sullia in Dakshina Kannada district, Karnataka, and also adjoining parts of Kodagu district, Karnataka and Kasaragod taluka of Kerala. Their customs and traditions are a mixture of Bunt customs and those of the shivalli brahmins.
  • Jain Bunt: the Jain Bunts are traditionally defined as a distinctive subdivision of the Bunt community and sometimes classified as a separate community in itself because they are Jains by faith while the other subdivisions are Hindu. The subdivision arose when some Bunt feudals embraced Jain traditions during the rule of the Hoysala Empire who propagated Jainism. They number around few thousands and speak either the Tulu language or Kannada language. They follow the aliya santana system of matrilineal inheritance, except for a few families who have taken to priestly duties. Their customs are a blend of the Jain customs and those of the Hindu Bunts.
Until the 20th century the rules of intermarriage and interdining were in existence and strictly followed. The community as a whole practised endogamy but subdivisional exogamy was practised only by the Masadika and the Nad who freely intermarried with each other. The Parivara and Jains favoured endogamy and though interdined with other subdivisions but did not intermarry except for rare instances where a woman from the Parivara subdivision could enter into marriage with a man from other subdivisions and a man from the Jain subdivison could enter into matrimonial alliance with a woman from other subdivisions. Apart from the above mentioned principal subdivisions there are about 90 clans found among the Bunts 
These clans claim descent either from the Alupas or Perumal kings  and were feudatories or rulers of small principalities that existed in Tulu Nadu until the period of British Raj.The Ballal Bunts until the 20th century as a rule neither interdined with other Bunts since they are strictly vegetarian and preferred endogamy.  The heads of ballal families mandatorily undergo theUpanayanam ceremony and wear the sacred thread called Janivara or Janeyu. Wearing of the sacred thread and practising vegetarianism is not a compulsion for other Bunts,but apart from the Ballals. Heads of other Bunt families who were erstwhile royalty or have the privileges of “Pattam” (the highest Hereditary title of nobility in Tulu Nadu region)  as also certain families called “Shetty Vala’’ and “Hegde’’ who are “Mukteshwar’’ or Muktesar (Administrative Trustees) of temples and solved civil or criminal disputes of areas they had jurisdiction in former times also wear the sacred thread.

Cuisine



Bunts form one of the major communities of Coastal Karnataka. Their cuisine draws inspiration from the local produce and fruits found in this region. Rice is used imaginatively to create a vast range of delicacies.Apart from certain clans among Bunts who strictly follow a vegetarian diet most Bunts aren't strictly vegetarian and eating of meat mainly of Fish and Fowl is permitted,But as caste Hindus consumption of Beef and meat from certain animals such as Pork is strictly prohibited  and doing so often resulted in excommunication or undertaking purificatory rituals during the pre-independence era.The most favoured meat preparaton of the Bunts is the chicken curry called kori gasee. Jackfruit, Banana, Mango etc., are used in various forms to prepare a wide variety of detectable dishes ranging from Kundapur to Kasargod, the Bunt cuisine contains many variations in use of ingredients and methods of preparation. This has only enhanced the distinctive flavors of each region and lent freshness to the culinary marvels of the community
The cuisine of Bunts is popular all over India especially in and around Mumbai where many Bunts own a number of hotels and restaurants . Bunts specialise both in vegetarian and non-vegetarian dishes.Among non-vegetarian dishes, Kori Rotti,Kane Gasee,Neer Dosa and kori gasee are well known. Vegetarian dishes include Gullāa Chutney,Pāthrode and Neer dosa Chutney
Traditional houses

Such traditional Bunt houses can still be seen across the Tulu Nadu region. One of the well preserved houses, Kodial Guthu, stands at the centre ofMangalore city. Other examples can be seen at Badila Guthu  in Kannur, Dakshina Kannada "Ullipady Guthu" near BantwalKolnadguthu nearMulkiBettampady GuthuThokur GuthuPaddana GuthuBavaGuthuBellakonja Guthu, on the outskirts of Mangalore city, Balladi Guthu and ShirvaNadibettu  near Udupi,Kodethuru Guthu near Kinnigoli as well as "Yedthre", "Kandavara" ,"Kolkebail" houses in Kundapura and "Santhya guthu" nearMangalore. Yelluruguthu is notably the largest house,representing six adjoining villages (Maganes) namely Kunjuru,Yelluru, Kolachuru, Ulluru, Majuru, Maniyuru etc. in the second largest village of Udupi Taluka, Yellur with the hereditary Mukteshwara of Yellur Vishweshwara temple.Prominent royal houses of the Bunts called Aramane are the Mulki Aramane, Kuthyar Aramane, Vitla Aramane, Kannajar Doddamane and the Maipady palace near Kasaragod,  among others.
Organisation

There are many organisations that cater to the needs of the community. The oldest among them is the Bunts Mathr Sangha based inMangalore. Since the 20th century when Bunts began to emigrate out of their native Tulu Nadu region various organisations were formed outside Tulu Nadu, such as the Bunts Sangha Mumbai established in 1927 in what was then known as Bombay. There are also organisations abroad, such as the Bunts Sangha of Kuwait and Bunts Sangha of the United Kingdom

Ettuveetil Pillamar

The Ettuveetil Pillamar (Lords of the Eight Houses) were a group of nobles from eight Nair Houses in erstwhile Venad in present day Kerala stateSouth India. They were associated with thePadmanabhaswamy temple in Thiruvananthapuram and the Ettara Yogam. They were known by the villages in which they resided and all of them held the title of Pillai. The Eight Lords wereKazhakoottathu Pillai, Ramanamadhom Pillai, Chempazhanty Pillai, Kudamon Pillai, Venganur Pillai, Marthandamadhom Pillai, Pallichal Pillai and Kolathur Pillai


Traditional Accounts

Origin
The Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple of Trivandrum was governed by the Ettara Yogam, an association consisting of seven Brahmin families, one Nair noble, each of them with one vote in deciding the affairs of the temple, and the king of Venad with the right to half a vote. Ettuveetil Pillamar were the leaders of the land and ‘tharakootams’ known as ‘Arunootavar’.  (the military setup of Nairs) established for maintaining law and justice in Venad. They were the Governors of provinces of the country. They had the power to exercise control over the king also. They were also the managers of ‘Ettarayogam’, which governed the activities of Sree Padmanabha Temple of Thiruvananthapuram gradually grew from ordinary landlords to powerful chiefs and allied themselves with the Ettara Yogam.  The lands and properties of the temple were divided into eight parts and each was placed by the Yogam under one of the Pillai as governor. Since the King had only half vote in deciding temple affairs, the Yogam and the Pillamar were considered outside his authority and hence their power and influence grew without any curtailment. They soon started opposing the king openly and bringing more and more Madampis or nobles under their influence.
Aim of the Eight
After Aditya Varma's assassination his niece Umayamma Rani became the regent. The Pillamar approached her with condolences and vowed to support her. But within a year, five of her six sons were cruelly drowned to death at the instigation of the Pillamar in the water pond known as Kalipankulam.
  Now the only heir to the Royal House was her eldest son. However as per the matriarchal traditions of Kerala owing to the absence of females the family could not be perpetuated. Umayamma then adopted a cousin, namely Kerala Varma, into the house but soon he was assassinated as well. She then adopted one boy and two girls from the Kolathunadu Royal House, the cousin family of the Travancore Royalty, from the family called Pally Kovilakam in 1684 just before her regency closed and her surviving son Ravi Varma became king. He adopted in 1689 two princesses and princes from Kolathunadu including Rajah Rama Varma. 
The Ettuveetil Pillai System, aided by the Ettara Yogam, became supreme power in Travancore to such an extent that the sovereign needed their permission even to construct a palace for himself at his capital. With so much power in their hands they wished to do away with the Royal House and all the earlier chroniclers of Travancore history have stated that their chief intention was to extirpate the Royal House and convert the state into a republic, and eventually under a monarchy under one of themselves.  With this in mind they plotted and assassinated Maharajah Aditya Varma by poisoning him and set the Palace on fire. 
The Eight lords and Marthanda Varma
Marthanda Varma was born in 1706 AD to the younger of the two adopted princesses of 1689 and right from his childhood he had to live constantly in hiding, in fear of his life. Many times assassination bids were made on his life. In 1728 an assassination attempt was made on the life of his sister and her son, the later Dharma Raja. However it was in 1729, when the Rajah Rama Varma, died that actual war was declared.
The Pillamar recognized a dangerous foe in Marthanda Varma and hence on the death of Rajah Rama Varma in 1730 they supported the Kunju Thampis. The late Rajah had left two sons, Padmanabhan and Raman Thampi and a daughter Ummini Thankachi. These children of the late king known as the Kunju Thampis now staked claim to the throne, in spite of the prevailingMarumakkathayam law. The Pillamar furnished them with enough money and men to seek aid from the Pandyas of Madurai. However Marthanda Varma managed to avert war by bribing away the Pandyan army. However soon after this the Kunju Thampimar were captured and killed at Nagercoil Palace. It may be stated that in popular folklore it is said that Marthanda Varma's enmity towards the Kunju Thampimar was because of their refusal to allow him to marry their sister. It is said that Ummini Thankachi killed herself after the execution of her brothers to escape Marthanda Varma.
The Pillamar were initially deterred by the fate of the Thampis, for they did not expect Marthanda Varma to kill his own cousins. However, soon after this, they plotted once again to murder the king but intelligence of this reached the king. On the day of the Arrat festival when the murder was to take place, Marthanda Varma appeared with an escort strong enough to cow down the Pillamar.  But having received proof of the intention of the Pillamar to murder him they were all rounded up and tried soon after this. 
The Eight were either killed or exiled after sufficient evidence of conspiracy and murder was procured. Their houses were dug up and all their assets and armies seized by the victoriousMarthanda Varma. Their women and children number around three thousand were given asylum by Jesuit priest of the nearby fishermen coast parish and was therefore called as Vettu kad or eight homes.Marthanda Varma also vowed to give Hundred Gold coins every year to the Jesuit parish priest for the welfare of these subjects The two palaces at Trivandrum known asRamanamadhom and Thevarathu Koikal were constructed from the wood and material of the palaces of the Pillamar.  The Travancore State Manual of Nagam Aiya concludes by saying,
Thus ended the long tale of crime and bloodshed committed by the lawless band of Ettuveetil Pillai and the Madampimar who molested the land for a period of two centuries and more
N. Chandrasekhar Pillai (The grand grand son of Chempazhanty Pillai) from Karikkakathil veedu Nanniyode Pacha was a former Indian National Congress Leader and Freedom Fighter who involved Kallara Pagode freedom fight.
Modern Views
Later historians, with many more records at their hand, have however disputed the story given by the earlier historians which were based on legend and folklore. While there is no doubt about the existence of anti royal nobles before Marthanda Varma,  as also frequent conflicts between the Sri Padmanabhaswamy Temple managers and the king, many of the events of the past were found to be entirely false.
The temple lands were managed by a group of nobles known as Madathil Pillamar, often mistaken for the Ettuveetil Pillamar. Earlier historians stated that the King had no authority over the temple and the Ettara Yogam and Pillamar were outside his control. However temple documents show that it was the king who appointed the highest dignitary of the temple, known as theSwamiyar. In fact, the authority of the king is considered to have been greatly valued for the records show the Yogam applying to the king for permission in trivial matters such as appointment of Temple sweepers.  Another contradiction found is in the fact that the Pillamar influenced the tenants of the temple lands. However the temple lands all lay to the south of Trivandrum where there were other influential nobles, whereas the bulk of the Pillamar lived to the north.  Records show clashes between Temple managers and the king's men but in none of these are the Pillamar mentioned. Another contradiction lies in the statement that since the 16th century the kings were mere puppets of the Yogam and Pillamar. It was during this period that the Travancore kings won victories over the mighty Vijayanagar Empire and the Thirumala Nayaks, which, it is asserted could not have been possible under a puppet king.
A major disagreement is registered regarding the aim of the Pillamar to extirpate the royal family. Even if they succeeded in killing the Royal family at Trivandrum, there were the other collateral branches at NedumangadKottarakara and Quilon, places where the Pillamar had no following.  It may be noted that all these branches participated in the meetings and management of the Temple and hence were active in Trivandrum also. In the document of 1730 regarding the execution of the Pillamar the name used for the conspirators is Ettuveetil Madampimar and not Pillamar. Besides, of the eight Pillais, only Kazhakoothathu Pillai and Kulathur Pillai are mentioned, the remainder being totally different individuals. The remaining six families are not mentioned at all, and it is improbable that the King who personally made investigations would let any of them go free.
Further important revelations made the by documents of the Temple are with regard to Aditya Varma and Umayamma Rani. The Temple records which refer to minor events such as appointment of sweepers in the temple have not stated anything on the palace of Aditya Varma being burnt down.  Also the story that Aditya Varma was poisoned to death is positively disproved for the temple records clearly state that Aditya Varma died at Padmanabhapuram in the Darpakulangara Palace and was cremated at Thiruvattar. The King had died a natural death.  Another significant fact that has come to light is that Umayamma Rani had no children at all and hence the story of the murder of her five children is disproved. The Royal family consisted only ofUmayamma Rani, a Senior Rani and Ravi Varma, the son of the Senior Rani. In fact, Umayamma had two adopted sons from 1677 who were however not in line of succession. However the stories of the assassination attempt of Marthanda Varma's sister in 1728 etc. are true, having occurred, at the instigation of, not the Pillamar, but the Rajah of Kayamkulam, the traditional enemy of Travancore. 
Thus many of the crimes for which the Pillamar are said to be have been punished were positively disproved. It is clear that there did exist refractory nobles of immense power and that Marthanda Varma did put an end to their authority and make that of the king supreme, but most of the stories about the Pillamar were found to be false.